Citadel Executive Challenges Repo Haircut Regulatory Findings
Citadel's Stephen Berger questions the accuracy of regulatory findings on repo haircuts, highlighting misconceptions in the data from the Office of Financial Research.
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to uphold a regulation from the Biden administration that aims to limit pollution from coal-fired power plants. This ruling allows the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to enforce stricter emissions standards while legal challenges continue to unfold.
The regulation in question mandates that many coal-fired power plants must either capture 90% of their carbon emissions or cease operations within eight years. Although the compliance deadlines do not take effect until 2025, the ruling is crucial for the Biden administration's broader climate goals, which include eliminating carbon pollution from the electricity sector by 2035 and achieving economy-wide reductions by 2050.
This ruling marks the third time this month that the Supreme Court has allowed an environmental regulation to remain in effect. Earlier in the month, the court also upheld regulations aimed at reducing methane and mercury emissions. However, the conservative majority has previously limited the EPA's authority in other cases, raising concerns about the future of environmental regulations.
The EPA estimates that the new rule could yield up to $370 billion in climate and health benefits and prevent nearly 1.4 billion metric tons of carbon pollution by 2047. This is equivalent to removing 328 million gasoline-powered cars from the roads annually.
As the legal challenges continue, the ruling sets a precedent for how the EPA can regulate emissions from power plants. The court's decision reflects a balancing act between environmental protection and economic considerations, a theme that is likely to persist in future legal battles.
The Supreme Court's decision to uphold the EPA's pollution limits for coal-fired power plants is a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle against climate change. As the nation grapples with the implications of this ruling, the focus will remain on how these regulations will be implemented and their impact on both the environment and the economy.
Citadel's Stephen Berger questions the accuracy of regulatory findings on repo haircuts, highlighting misconceptions in the data from the Office of Financial Research.
Former U.S. regulators express satisfaction with Basel outcomes, urging continued U.S. participation in the Basel Committee amid skepticism from the current administration.
The CFTC has revised its swaps regulations to address outdated rules and clarify regulatory ambiguities, amidst industry scrutiny and the need for modernization.
We're just a bunch of guys mixing up market news with our own brand of banter, giving you the lowdown on stocks with a twist at Walk The Street Capital.